“Why not just use ChatGPT?” Or "Which team member is best to start using Clinials"
Fair questions. My answer is usually "awesome that you have empowered your team members using ChatGPT, and they are also the very same people who will love using Clinials
Common concern, addressed
“ChatGPT can do this cheaper.”
ChatGPT is general-purpose. Clinials is secured, structured, repeatable, workflow-aware, and designed for regulated use, where context, consistency and governance matter.
ChatGPT is powerful. But in clinical trials, power without precision slows you down.
ChatGPT is a generalist. Clinials is purpose-built.
ChatGPT helps individuals think faster.
Clinials helps teams execute faster.
With Clinials, the difference shows up quickly:
• No prompt engineering or setup time
• Deterministic extraction of protocol-critical content
• Outputs mapped to real clinical workflows, not generic text
• Built-in traceability back to the protocol
• Consistency across studies, teams, and regions
In trials, speed isn’t about generating words.
It’s about reducing rework, interpretation risk, and downstream delays.
That’s why Clinials isn’t “ChatGPT for clinical trials.”
It’s infrastructure for clarity, so sites, sponsors, and patients can move with confidence. Generate clinical trial content from the protocol in minutes, not days.
AI will keep getting louder this year.
Execution is what will separate signal from noise.
